The new Forekaster has certainly got closer spaced knobs but thats about the only thing theoretically less-wet-friendly about it. Mountain Bike Deals, Copyright 2023 Blue Spruce Ventures LLC | Tried one one . Maxxis calls it a trail tire on there official website. (New annually renewing membership only. The tyres in the shot above were installed at the same time, and you can see how pronounced the rear wear is. Maxxis Ardent is one of the biggest names for mountain bike tires right now. I know the 2.25 on my 29er and the 2.4 WT on my 27.5 measured out the same, and the 27.5 was on a rim that was 7mm wider internally. 27.5 x 2.60 Please. CAD The tire has "mid-height tread blocks spaced evenly and openly to . Its a good tire for moderately aggressive cyclists, but isnt a true all-condition tire, trading some grip and stability for a lightweight design and increased speed. The two tires have a similar width, with only .05 inch different (the Forekaster is the narrower of the two). It can find its spot on many bikes front or rear for whatever traction your bike needs. Allow Necessary Cookies & Continue For similar rolling speed with improved braking and cornering performance, check out the Rekon. Thick outside knobs really hold up to hard cornering and the rolling resistance is pretty good for a more aggressive tire. Continue with Recommended Cookies. I prefer the forkasters if damp or loose. Two thumbs up. Intended to be a "Goldilocks" tire, the new Forekaster (released July 2022) rolls faster than a Minion or even the Dissector but provides more predictable cornering, climbing, and braking traction than the Aspen or Rekon. They seemed like a decent tyre for my needs, especially for the weight but I miss the 3C compound on my newer pair. Seem to be the best combo of grip, price, durability, and weight. The Ardent is also somewhere in the middle of wider profile tires. Maxxis Forekaster vs Ardent Like the Ardent, the Forekaster is tubless ready. Excludes Gift Memberships, Discount applies to first year. The old Forekaster was basically Maxxis version of the Nobby Nic, but then Schwalbe updated the Nic tread with more aggressive and closely spaced cornering knobs and which improved that tyre immensely. Maxxis' Ardent 2.4 is, in my opinion, the most underrated tire on the market. The Ardent has been part of the Maxxis lineup for years. Aspen in the rear and slightly more tread up front like an Ikon or Ardent Race for dry, Aspen in the rear with a Forekaster up front for loose or wet conditions, Front and rear for fast, predictable handling with matched sizes, Front 2.35 and rear 2.2 for volume to speed, Rear with Ardent or Forekaster for loose or wet conditions. The Ardent does well in most conditions and is a particularly fast tire of firm terrain. Maxxis Ardent, Bontrager XR4, Continental Trail King and Schwalbe Hans Dampf. Youll also see the casing width increase with the 2.35 moving to 2.4, while the 2.6 option remains. For trail riders who don't want to lug around heavy enduro tires but still want plenty of traction, the new Forekaster gets itright. When an Aspen in the rear isnt enough (wet Autumn and Winter), I mount an Agressor (god I love this tyre during those months). DHRII front with Ikon, Ardent, Ardent Race, Rekon or Ikon in the rear in a smaller size, Padded / Protective Short Liners / Chamois, The Best XC / Trail Tires by Maxxis - Light & Fast (Proven to Make You Faster) [Video], Drilling Holes To Avoid Headset Cable Routing, Brake Pad Compounds & Tons Of New MTB Products Ep. Singletrack uses affiliate services calledSkimlinksandwhich means we may earn revenue if you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer on our site. Black Chili compound wears well. While I wouldn't consider myself a weight weenie, I do look at the weight on tires and wheels. I have the now older version and quite happy with it. Thanks Ziphead, I just discovered that there is a Maxxis Ardent Race 2.35 tire. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. For fast hardpack punctuated by loose, dry sections, the Dissector has few equals. As my skills improved and my bikes got better, my speed also increased and I gradually progressed to a Butcher front and a Purgatory rear. Were told that the 29 x 2.4 Dual compound will be available very soon, with prices ranging from $83 to $101. Is this the best tire combo? Coming in a 2.2 or 2.35, it pairs nicely with the classic Ikon or Ardent Race tires as a front. The tread has been beefed up a little, and Maxxis now says it's designed for modern short travel trail bikes. Part of that, Appleman Bicycles has released the 2XR FIT Crankset, available to buy or to rent, with the aim of helping riders find the perfect crank length, It wasnt until day three of the 23 Sea Otter Classic that Elliot Tanner, the Founder/CEO of Stashed finally flagged me down to show me. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. The center portion of the tread is also noticeably wider, and there isnt as much of a height difference between in center, intermediate, and outer tread. I am going to give it a try. For example, when I started riding in Colorado I was happy with a Ground Control front and a Fast Trak rear but I was also slooow. I am currently riding on Maxxis Ikon 292.35 front and rear on my full suspension cross country bike. Continue with Recommended Cookies. Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total). To help with this tires versatility, Maxxis offers it in a 2.2 or 2.35 casing. This is a comparison of the Ardent versus some other fast rolling tires, albeit all in a narrower width as this comparison was for XC oriented tires: There was an interview of a Maxxis marketing guy on NSMB, he openly stated that he doesn't like the Ardent at all and there are better options from maxxis that do the same job better (Recon). The Maxxis Ardent is a light duty trail tire that rolls fast in dry conditions. Anthony Smith Maxxis classifies the Forekaster as an 'aggressive XC' tire, which seems about right: it rolls fast, and accelerates incredibly well at 735 grams for the 120tpi, EXO-casing version. It also makes a great rear tire when looking for speed in the back and some more tread up front like what you would get with the Ardent, Ardent Race or Forekaster. It always felt sketchy when really leaned into the corner. Anything more and that goes into the next category of tires. Strengths: Fastest rolling of this bunch. Calling it a Goldilocks tire, Maxxis envisions the new Forekaster as the ideal step between their current XC options and more aggressive trail and enduro tires. In this review, our customer Jordan goes with the Ardent in front and Forekaster in the rear. However, the Ardent is a better performer if youre looking for a most solid kind of grip in a responsive and speedy tire design. I have run the forecaster in front, but only as an XC tire for xc marathon races. On that note, at $93 / 80 Maxxis is now sitting at the premium side of current tire pricing. In fact, these two tires are often paired together as they offer a relatively balanced combined performance. No longer marketed as only a wet weather option for the XC world, Maxxis all-new tire takes aim at the quickly growing world of aggressive XC & Trail. For the rear, I opted for something a little lighter that I thought might be more likely to give it up in fast tight turns. Schwalbe Magic Mary Purple Addix front. I/m loving the advances in technology over the 12 years! We received a 292.4 WT in 3C Maxx Terra, which is recommended for all mountain trails from hard pack to loose over hard. Similar post over on bikepacking.com shows an image of a Forekaster in an Exo+ casing, I wonder if those quoted weights are for the thicker casing? A forum community dedicated to Mountain Bike owners and enthusiasts. With their lower well-placed design, the pattern rolls well too. I will grant you though that a .25 inch difference on an Ikon on the same rim made a noticeable difference in volume and pressure I could roll with, and I'm guessing that imparts improvements, so I've considered going to a 2.4. I don't know if the tread is worn too much or if I've improved to the point that I'm needing more for what I do on my trails than it can offer. Maxxis have the Forekaster in both 27.5" and 29" models, in 2.25" width and 2.35" widths too. It also happens to be pretty light for the amount of traction it provides, which I don't think anyone will complain about. The Ardent supports a moderately aggressive lean, but it takes a little experience to figure out where the limits of the tire really are. The Forekaster weighs only 735g with dual compound and EXO sidewall protection. Along with a spike-like design, most of the knobs or spikes also have generous siping, making sure those tall knobs conform to anything they can grab onto when the dirt gets slippery. The Ikon excels in dry conditions with its 3C compound options and the small siping on each knob across the tire. The most aggressive trail tyre in the Continental line-up is the Trail King (previously known, rather kinkily, as the Rubber Queen). Thanks Matt. The ample sipes on the nobs make for some sure-footed climbing on both medium dirt and rocks. Singletracks Merch | I couldn't fault it at. We ran it as a dedicated front. And, to be frank, all I have is photographs to go off. If your your rims are inner width i25mm or wider (which is how most XC bikes come these days), you might consider a 2.6in tire like the Maxxis Rekon. I would not consider this the typical XC tire unless your typical XC race is the Downieville Classic where 3k feet of climbing is followed by 30mph+ descents. Aside from the fact that I spend most of my time with them removing them from test bikes after one terrifying ride. I will start with the faster rolling, smaller tread tires and continue into the heavier, knobbier tires that tend to have more traction. It needs a bit more volume (2.35) but it was fine round a very muddy ashton court at new year. In a nut shell, this tyre works best if youre fully committed to a corner and tip it in! Maxxis DHR II 3C MaxxTerra rear. Yeah, no 3c was a dealbreaker for me, esp for a damp conditions tyre. The DHRII has large ramped knobs in the center that take up most of the tread, and then transition to classic Minion side knobs. Something to sit between the Aspen/Ikon/Ardent and the Assegai/Minion/Dissector. Let's find out! In a 2.25 size, the Ardent has a good, tall bag to it, offering plenty of cushion and encouraging lower pressures. The Ikon is a good option for riders who are looking for a less aggressive kind of trail ride, and who dont mind a little looseness in their ride. The wear on the Maxxis has been very even and consistent for me. Not super light but it's worth it for the EXO protection and not feeling the need to carry a tube. I could try it out and see. The Ardent is just a touch thicker than the Ikon, 2.4 compared to 2.2. I have the 2.4 Ardent on the front of my Yeti SB5 and Intense Primer. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. I've run the Ardent/Forekaster combo and it was better than a Forekaster on both. I have been a writer for nigh on 20 years, a photographer for 25 years and a mountain biker for 30 years. This allows the center of the tire to roll fast providing just enough traction when climbing and braking but not comprising any speed. Its a good combination tire, but most users do note that there are other newer tires in the Maxxis line and others that outperform the Ardent as both a specialist tire and an all-purpose design. While there are a huge number of choices from Maxxis, we have picked out our favorite models and the combinations that we love to ride them in. He has been writing about whats new in the bicycle world for 12+ years. The Rekon is made to be a bit more aggressive than the Ikon but with some additional tire tech. While Ardent tires are very durable and rolling resistance and reactivity dont generally change much with wear, they do tend to become more prone to slips and drifting as they age. The tires come with EXO protection, which means a few grams of added weight, but significantly better durability. https://www.dirtmerchantbikes.com/snorthwest-summer-2015-xc-tire-comparison-test. AUD Contact UsPrivacyForum RulesClassifieds RulesLink RemovalNewsletter SettingsAdvertising. When it comes to Maxxis' treads, people tend to gravitate to the established gravity-meats (i.e., the Minion or High Roller series) or the pinner XC treads, such as the Ikon. It might not be as classic as some of the other Maxxis XC tires, but it will surely create some great traction without the weight of some other tires. NZD, Padded / Protective Short Liners / Chamois, Maxxis Ardent/Forekaster Tire Combo: Customer Review, Drilling Holes To Avoid Headset Cable Routing, Brake Pad Compounds & Tons Of New MTB Products Ep. The DHR2 is a hell of a tyre on the back though. As I said, this tire is a classic and finds itself in its fair share of combinations, so we'll list some of the more common tire combinations and sizes/casing options. The hang up there is it's only .15 of an inch difference, and Maxxis tires often times won't measure out to their stated dimensions, so I might be stuck with the same tread after a swap if I just get a bigger Rekon. Details and Specifications: Use: Aggressive XC,. I was initially running a 2.35 Ikon on the back and while it has a surprising amount of grip, in the fall with the leaves on the ground, I found it lacking in traction when crawling up steep climbs and in the corners. There are no sub-800g 29er Forekasters now, with only one (wired) 29er option in 2.25. However, the tread is significantly thicker on the Minion, which is what gives it better loose soil traction. I got a Forecaster to last 18 months & was amazed to wear it out. The Ardent 2.4 is marketed as a do it all tire with high volume and comes in at 864g. A nippy tyre for modest trail bikes. When that tire loses cornering traction, it loses it right away and does not hook back up easily. The Forekaster is Maxxis's closest to the Nic- it's tougher, and heavier, but very similiar. The tread of the Minion is similar in design to the Ardent. Staff Rides: Mike Kazimer's Coil Shock Trek Fuel EX, First Ride: The New GT Sensor Loses Weight, Gains Travel, Review: TruTune Suspension Inserts Unlock More Travel, Bike Check: Nino Schurter's Custom 10-Time World Champion Scott Spark RC. I love the Ikons on the back but I am getting really tired of them washing out on the front. Honestly, I'd get rid of the Ardent. It can also be used as a more aggressive front tire for XC racing when the terrain is technical or loose. However, the large outer tread still performs just as well with moderate and even severe pitting, and the rubber doesnt lose reactivity or traction with wear and tear. Rolling downhill or on a straightaway, youll notice that its a very efficient design, cutting your effort and letting you rest up for the next uphill slope on your trail. FWIW, Im a big fan of the DHF up front. 111 [Podcast], Best of the Month! That said, if you already have the appropriate tools and a pneumatic pump on hand, theres no reason no to speed the whole process up. By signing up for email newsletters, you agree to BikeRumor's, Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window). 2022 Knolly Fugitive 138. Ardent The outgoing model was already a great downcountry tire. The Maxxis Ardent is something of a do-it-all trail tire thats had relatively high success rates and popularity with mountain cyclists for a while now. Or is it? The side nobs are not as aggressive as those on the Ardent. :/. Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox. I'd do Ardent in front and Forekaster rear. Cannot be used in conjunction with other offers, or when switching memberships). GBP I am cuurently running Forekaster up front and Ardent Race rear on a HT Stumpjumper. CAD However, a tire like the Ardent thats less specialized and more of a generalist on the trail is also going to fall short of more specialized tires in their performance specialties. The harder-wearing PaceStar compound is recommended for the rear or youll be shelling out for new rubber very quickly. I had a funny feeling that mentioning Ardents would draw some very good responses. Use as a front paired with an Aspen or Ikon rear for an "aggressive" XC setup. Although I am a Lancastrian, I freely admit that West Yorkshire is my favourite place to ride. 4.23) [Video], CushCore Trail Insert - The Perfect Middle Ground For Tubeless Inserts, Wolf Tooth ReMote Pro - The New & Refined Dropper Remote. I am having trouble on deciding between the Maxxis Forekaster 2.35 or the Ardents 2.4. The forekaster has surprisingly good grip for it's weight, and it performs well in a wide range of conditions (dry loose over hard all the way to slightly greasy clay) but it is no doubt, a reduced rolling resistance xc/trail tire. This would be great of pair with a dissector upfront or a minion. Zach Overholt is the Editor in Chief of Bikerumor. Intended to be a Goldilocks tire, the new Forekaster rolls fast but also provides solid cornering and braking traction in a broad range of trail conditions. Run the same tire front and rear, run the same tread but large volume up front, or what most of us at Worldwide do: run a more aggressive front tire with a faster rolling rear tire so you can let it slide out back while being in control up front. XC Tires Maxxis Forekaster 2.35" (Front) & Rekon Race 2.35" (Rear) EXO +Lightweight +Fast rolling-Less traction-Less durable . Loving this combo at the moment. MrRideAlong - Assuming you were suggesting I upgrade the Rekon to a wider version of what I have, I hesitate to think a .15 inch difference in width would make that big of a difference. Prior to that, Zach spent many years in the back of a bicycle shop building and repairing nearly every type of bike, while figuring out how to (occasionally) ride them. Aggressor rolls much quicker in the dry/firm, but it is dual vrs 3C too which will have a bearing. My son loves Ardents & I ride Forecasters. The lightweight design and ramped knobs make this one of the faster models of tire designed for mountain trails. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. This tire handled a mix of hardpack, medium, and loose over hard no problem. Durability is one of the areas that the Ardent really shines. Once inflated, it is easy to see the rounder profile compared to the Ardent Race it replaced, and holding them side-by-side the extra spacing . Strengths: Huge volume at a reasonable weight. I'm a big fan of Maxxis and find all their tires to be reliable. Was hoping it would be closer to 850g but still very keen to give them a go! I would say the Ikon lends itself to be the most predictable XC tire in this lineup if your goal is going fast. But while the Ardent is dual-compound rubber in the center tread, the Forekaster is dual compound throughout. In your case, that would be the Ardent Race. Lastly, I simply can't trust a trail tire that doesn't have some sort of added protection. Still, its always good to chat rubber init. An Aspen is never enough in the front, and if it is, then you should be riding a gravel bike. It doesnt have the aggressive squared-off profile some cornering tires prefer, but its more rounded shape also doesnt have any dead zones or major loss of reactivity and grip. That being said, the Ardent tests well as both a front-mounted tire and a rear-mounted tire. Good grip in a variety of conditions, decent volume, low drag, and peace of mind. Im mainly cross while my son is mainly enduro. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. The 2 by 2 tread is also relatively squared off, which works to increase traction between your tire and the terrain. As a front, rear, or double tire set, the Ardent is designed for moderately aggressive cyclists who like cornering at speed, but dont tend to take on trails with particularly loose soil or in highly adverse conditions. Company MTB Parts & Accessories (Ep. I thought the old Forekaster was ok for what it was. FEATURES OF THE NEW MAXXIS FOREKASTER INCLUDE: The new Forekaster slots into the Maxxis mountain line between our XC options that prioritize rolling speed (Aspen, Rekon Race, Ikon, Rekon) and our gravity-focused treads (Dissector, Minion DHF, Minion DHR, Assegai) which emphasize cornering and braking traction. USD Wouldn't recommend it, basically for the same reason. Weaknesses: Not the best for tubeless use. Id say its been a Dissector and Rekon as a guess. The Ardent marks yet another classic XC/Trail tire for Maxxis, bridging the gap between super fast rolling but sometimes not enough tread, and something more like a Minion DHR II that moves into large tread territory. If that doesnt work out the plan is to move it to the rear and put a Forekaster on the front. Especially mounted as a read tire, the Ardent is just a touch drifty, especially if you like to corner hot, but not so much that youre likely to lose control of the tire, much less the bike as a whole. The Forekaster and Rekon combo is a popular setup for a lot of the NICA racers in Utah. Width options range from 2.4 to 2.6 and Wide Trail offerings. Forekaster With tons of options for front and rear, the combination is endless. Employee Review Id also love to know this. Calling it a "Goldilocks" tire, Maxxis envisions the new Forekaster as the ideal step between their current XC options and more aggressive trail and enduro tires. It measures 2.35 at the nobs and 2.3 at the casing on a 26mm internal width rim. However, the tires are again similar in that they tend to have less grip and slip a little more on very loose terrain types. Ardent 2.4 in front. When an Aspen isnt enough tire but a Minion is too much, choose the new Maxxis Forekaster.. Rarely a week goes by without me riding and exploring the South Pennines. Maxxis That said, the tread is only moderately aggressive, and it looks like less of an all-terrain all-condition tire than many of its competitors. Ill be after these as soon as theyre available. Wheels and tires are what make the most difference when it comes to weight and on a small travel bike, the best weight to traction ratio win the spots on my bikes. That is, there is very little rolling resistance when youre riding the bike centered. Contrary to what another poster said, I wouldn't cheap out on tires. I agree with Minimus, the Ardent is not a great tire. Great under brakes. The Maxxis Forekaster is a bit more of a rarity to see, being the go-to Maxxis XC tire for very loose soil or mud. Thats 200g less rotating mass! You can choose how much grip you want, how fast the tire rolls, and what wheel you want to put it on with Maxxis. Enter the Forekaster 29x2.35 Maxxis's unapologetic copy of the Schwalbe Nobby Nic. The two tires have a similar width, with only .05 inch different (the Forekaster is the narrower of the two). Weaknesses: A bit vague in intermediate corners. product review We have one guy ion our group that tried them on his Ripley and ditched them after 2-3 rides. Visit the high-res gallery for more images. This is another tire set that is often used together, but the Forekaster is a slightly looser, slightly faster option that adapts to aggressive riding styles somewhat better than the Ardent. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. For the terrain I ride, it has been a great combination on my SS and rolls surprisingly well for that kind of tire. Strengths: Meaty, moto-style tread digs into loose surfaces. The design offers the best traction on firm surfaces, with variable results in other conditions. The hang up there is it's only .15 of an inch difference, and Maxxis tires often times won't measure out to their stated dimensions, so I might be stuck with the same tread after a swap if I just get a bigger Rekon. Marked as a 2.35, they dwarf just about all other non-downhill specific tyres out there. You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Focus Sleep Conference 2022,
Converting From Methodist To Episcopal,
Forage Jp Morgan Virtual Internship Solutions,
Sweet Potato And Tuna Bodybuilding,
Articles M